Kantegger

Best Personal Statements are Here


From Text to Textures: Redefining Reading in the Multisensory Realm

“Zhe Te Dong” “YiTeYi” might seem like unintelligible utterances, yet they are in fact unique worlds, crafted by a seven-year-old boy. Only he can decipher these characters, for they are the fabric of his creation.

The publication of Joe’s first book, “The Little Bus and His Family,” was my initial case study, and it required a year-long collaboration. Each week, we spent an hour immersed in his stories about a world inhabited by buses while sketching out these narratives. I observed the intricate network of subway lines, highways, and even the unique script of Bus City he painstakingly etched out.

This unforgettable journey showcased the innate ability of children to comprehend and construct their reality. It prompted me to question why studies on children’s literature largely focused on textual critique, neglecting the equally important child-audience interaction with visual sources (E. Arizpe & M. Styles, 2016). Fortunately, this perspective is beginning to shift.

In my class, the favored picture book is Curious George, a tale of an ingenious monkey whose problem-solving adventures captivate the children. They are also fascinated by books devoid of text, such as Iwai’s “A House of 100 Stories,” which encourages them to spin tales from illustrations. Adult participation, as in Hervé Tullet’s Mix It Up, greatly enhances children’s reading experience, emphasizing the co-creation in children’s literature. This co-creation suggests that the author’s final full stop is not the end of creation, but rather the beginning of a new cycle as the audience’s response is channeled back into the literary marketplace.

The definition of children’s literature remains nebulous. Classics like “Harry Potter” and “The Book Thief” also resonate with adults, revealing a vast difference between child and adult readers when their reading processes are considered.

The evolution of modern media technology has broadened how readers interpret texts. In my class, story reading has shifted from a teacher-led activity to a multimedia experience. I’ve witnessed this change in Galle, Sri Lanka, where the traditional classroom is replaced by age-based gathering spots under shacks. There, children use jigsaw toys to craft narratives. This approach has proven effective at the Autistic Children Rehabilitation Center, where music and wordless picture books facilitate interaction with the world.

Children’s reading has morphed into a multifaceted process, as exemplified by ABC KIDS in Australia. There, children read paper books while watching related videos on mobile devices. As educators, we must navigate a world saturated with visual information. The advent of digital media and VR technology suggests that reading will soon encompass auditory and tactile experiences. This expansion of the reading experience implies that children’s literature transcends printed texts and ventures into a more complex domain. But what are the cognitive implications of this shift for children? How will new technologies reshape reading?

My previous research centered on children’s perception of digital media and their interaction with various text forms. One study, presented at the HCI International 2020 HCI in Games section, employed the Attention networks task (ANT) to assess video games’ impact on children’s attention networks. We discovered that frequent video gaming negatively influenced children’s orienting networks but positively impacted their executive networks. In essence, video games can distract children, yet enable them to react faster. As game designers, this presents a conundrum: how to balance these effects. This dilemma persists across all materials provided to children. If we could map these influences onto children’s cognitive abilities, could we enhance the positive effects while minimizing the negative? Although this process may be intricate, we have attempted to explore it. Our experiments, employing single-factor design variable methods, compared the effects of e-books and paper books on children’s comprehension and subjective assessments.

Inspired by Professor Arizpe and her team’s case studies on children’s interaction with visual texts, I plan to conduct mini case studies each semester, encouraging children to narrate their own stories in various forms. This mirrors my approach with Joe’s case study. Recognizing the fluidity of children’s development, I incorporated a QR Code linked to Joe’s personal website on the book’s back cover, providing a platform for continuous content update. My ultimate goal is to showcase children’s original creations, be they e-books, videos, or other innovative formats.

I remain committed to enhancing children’s media literacy. The CMLC project’s curriculum, aimed at deepening our understanding of children and culture, aligns with my interests. My studies at the University of Glasgow and Aarhus University focused on children’s literature development and defining childhood and children’s literature from a media perspective. My second-year studies at the Autonomous University of Barcelona will be more hands-on. Reading River, Annotations (McAdam, J. E., Arizpe, E., Devlin, A. M., Farrell, M. and Farrar, J., 2004), and parent-teacher collaboration (Tizard, Schofield, J. Hewison, 1982) are established methods of promoting children’s reading. Although multimedia’s emergence has amplified program design possibilities, the balance must be struck due to load theory, which posits that overly complex multimedia may hinder children’s text comprehension (Acha, 2008). If we could address this issue through careful design and repetition, it would bolster multimedia’s role in promoting children’s reading and maximize its benefits. This forms the core of my second-year study plan. I am excited about the collaboration ahead.



One response to “From Text to Textures: Redefining Reading in the Multisensory Realm”

  1. Comment from GPT-4:

    Dear Admissions Committee,

    The applicant under review has submitted an exhaustive and intellectually stimulating personal statement, underlining their profound understanding of the dynamics of children’s literature and the expanding role of digital media in education. Their unique experiences, alongside a firm academic foundation, position them as a compelling candidate for your program.

    The personal experiences they recount, particularly their collaborative work with a child in creating an original book, reveal their thoughtful engagement with the field and a depth of empathy that speaks to their potential as a scholar and an educator. Their insights into how children’s realities can be understood and constructed through literature shows maturity and nuanced perception. Their interest in the evolving nature of child and adult readership, particularly in the face of modern technology, is praiseworthy.

    The applicant’s past research and teaching experiences lend them practical experience in the field. Their observations about the shift from traditional story reading to multimedia experiences showcase a sharp understanding of the current educational landscape. Their stated goal to enhance children’s media literacy resonates profoundly with the spirit of pedagogy and children’s education.

    However, there are several areas in which the application could be strengthened. The applicant could offer a more explicit discussion of their theoretical approach. They mention several key theories and concepts but do not delve into their personal interpretations or how these theories have specifically influenced their teaching and research practices.

    While discussing their teaching experience and research, the applicant would benefit from providing more specifics about their roles, responsibilities, and methodologies. This could offer a clearer context for their experiences and furnish more tangible evidence of their competence in this field.

    Lastly, while the array of references and concepts shows erudition, it also risks overwhelming the reader. Concentrating on fewer, but key references and thoroughly explaining their significance might make their statement more coherent and accessible.

    In summary, despite these areas for potential improvement, the applicant’s evident dedication to children’s literature, proven experience in the field, and articulate exploration of the intersections between literature, technology, and pedagogy render them a strong candidate for your program.

    Given their passion, academic foundation, and practical experiences, my decision is to **Recommand** the applicant, provided they could further clarify the points mentioned above during the interview process.

    Sincerely,
    ChatGPT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About Me

As a dedicated Personal Statement Mentor, I specialise in guiding students through the process of crafting personal statements that truly reflect their individuality and experiences. My role involves helping students highlight their unique journeys and stand out in competitive admissions processes.

“Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?”

– Mary Oliver